MJ ESTATE v MJ FAN

 ESTATE V TAAJ
PLEASE SEE ESTATE VS HTWF
IT RELATES TO THIS CASE!

 The Michael Jackson Estate has now resulted to bullying MICHAEL JACKSON FANS!!! For which i can only assume, for speaking up against them!!





(For the record, I no longer support Howard Mann)This Video recorded March 24th   was sent to John Branca by my competitor!! five days later the Estate are “Trying” to register this Trademark: Go here: Click “Search Marks”  http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/index.jsp   in search enter: THE OFFICIAL ONLINE TEAM OF THE MICHAEL JACKSON ESTATE  Notice date applied for this mark on 29th March. My domain name was acquired Feb 8th, so really they have no grounds to come along and BULLY me!! See Law: http://www.icann.org/en/dndr/udrp/policy.htm  Needless to say i will fight them, I wont publish my evidence here: As i dont want to fore warn them!! There are hundreds of sites using the name MICHAEL JACKSON! Its interesting they are NOT going after any of those. Or this company in Germany sitting on a mountain of MICHAEL JACKSON trademarks  (search here:http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/index.jsp   enter MICHAEL JACKSON:  See this mark number: 77788663)    But instead they have chosen to go after me!! I am a single Mom who has dedicated her life to informing fans around the world on the local news relating to Our Beloved King of Pop. I do not sell on this site, no infringement, Its simple and clear THEY WANT TO SHUT ME UP!!! Notice last comment on their complaint “this Complaint is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to “harass” hmmmm, how else would you explain this NONESENSE!! Is this what Michaels money is being wasted on!! Michael would NEVER approve of this!! Money which should be going to Mama Jackson and Michael babies tossed down the drain!! THIS IS RETALIATION FROM JOHN BRANCA I EXERCISED MY FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS “FREEDOM OF SPEECH”

This is Their complaint:
After i replied and forwarded my proof, this was all LIES. Branca filed another 25 pages: To which i responded with more evidence, then the case was Denied, here is full details of the decision. Click this: